Toggle Sidebar
  • Recent updates
    • Post is under moderation
      It would be helpful to be able access the time capture values in the specific item that uses the time capture feature on it's forms, to show and use the information for sums and decisions of the item.... More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Filtering would make Product Backlog screen more scalable for large data sets from existing customers who are trying to migrate towards Agile. The RM Agile Product Backlog tab has a scalability issue ...for customers who have thousands of features and stories.The 'Split View' for requirements is another view that would permit an option for filtering, but the Product Backlog screen shows Epics, Features, and Stories all in one compact view along with how they relate to one another.My RM customer with these 20-thousand requirements would benefit from being able to filter their Epics, Features, and Story records in the Product Backlog tab.As it is now, if I use the 'Split View' tab to link a Feature to a Release, only the feature is linked; none of the feature's story(child) objects are linked in the process.Until there are attribute filters for the Product Backlog screen, my users will need to use the Split View screen as a workaround. Please implement filtering for the Product Backlog screen for attributes in Epics, Features, and Stories. Thanks,Joshua Trosclair More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      We would appriciate to use If-then-else statements in notification templates. Currently only things like IF(canview), IF(auxtable), IF(itemtype) are possible and e.g. IF(Itemtype ist quite useless if... you use different templates for different Apps. If you're using system field ISSUETYPE and expect this to be the itemtype, it's not working. We would like to see something like $IF(fieldname,fieldvalue) Text 123 $ENDIF()Instead of "Text 123" $FIELDVALUE(fieldname) should be possible as well. The perfect way would be to have elseif as well or be able to nest more than one of these if's. Besides the option to use "like" would be great as well. $IF(fieldname,fieldvalue%) or $IF(fieldname,~fieldvalue) Thank you More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Franz Andel
      Ability to reply to comments and notes in an SBM item. We have several customers who would like to be able to reply to comments made in the system. Like in most social media areas you can write a new ...comment but you can also reply to someone else’s comment and have your reply show up under the original comment with a slight indentation. I believe this is a feature that would be very useful to everyone using SBM. More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Franz Andel
      There is a new "feature" which causes SBM to copy all field values to the new item during a post transition into the same primary table. Unfortunately this is activated by default. This happens even i...f there are only one or two fields mapped. If you remove all mappings from post transition and set just 2 new mappings, it should just copy these two fields to the new item. Unfortunately since SBM 11.4 it does not, although it's described like this in the manual. All fields are copied! Instead of fixing this bug, there's now (11.5) a new Setting in TS_SYSTEMSETTINGS which is named "SetFldsForPostCopyTransOrig" Here you have to set the TS_LONGVALUE to 0 to get the desired result, as it is described in the manual. If you don't switch this setting, SBM will always copy all fields with the same name. But this setting can only be changed in the database table directly. There's no option to change it in a GUI, like System Administrator or SBM Configurator.I think, any important setting like this should be reachable in some kind of GUI! So please provide a way to switch this. However it would be much more userfriendly to decide what to copy on a transition base. Maybe just a little checkbox inside the post-option menu named "copy all fields" if it's activated, the new feature is active an all fields are copied. No grid for the fields to be mapped should be displayed. If the the checkbox is unselected, only the mapped fields should be copied to new items. This would be the way it worked before 11.4.Actually all of this is unnecessary if it would just do what it should: "Copy the mapped fields" and "Do not copy what is not mapped". Thank you More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      When the Time Capturing is activated for a state or transition any user can see the values in the widget and even add new entries. This is not what most users want. Usually time capturing is for inte...rnal users and external users like customers or item submitters should not be able to enter their own time capturings. It would be necessary to provide an option for this. Either simply by adding some new rights to the security tab for the roles like "View Time Capturing", "Add Time Capturing", "Edit Time Capturing", "Delete Time Capturing".Or even better add it like a "field-like"-value so it's possible to assign a section per workflow, Transition, state and configure the visibility and the ability to be changed or not. Just like with fields. Both ways should bring the ability to hide the time capturing from specific Roles. Our current Workaround is NOT to add the widget on the forms. Then SBM puts it in the Change History Section which is hideable in the Security Roles. But this is not really what is needed. Could be possible that we want to allow the external users to view the Change History. More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Currently only Single User Fields can be defined as owner of an item per state. It would be helpful to be able to select a Sub-Relational Field that points to a user-field in an AUX or Primary Table a...s owner. In case you're clasifying the items by any relational-field (AUX-Table) and depending on that choice there are different responsible persons to handle the issues, Sub-Relational fields are perfectly suitable to show always the correct responsible person. Unfortunately this user field can not be used as the owner of the item as it's a Sub-Relational field, which leads you to use scripts instead of built-in functunality. I would appriciate to see this option coming. It would help us a lot. More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Currently the creator of an activity view can share this activity and define user(s) as Co-owner. But these users are only allowed to add or remove feeds and change some display criteria. In case the...re's any error in the feed or a new filter is needed, they are not allowed to change this, although the role 'Co-Owner' implicates to have the same rights as the owner. Item feeds can only be privat or public. There's nothing in between. But even public feeds can only be changed by the creator or by an administrator.It's not ok to give full admin rights to users who should be able to change feeds, because there are much more rights combined with this. We would like to see either a separate User privilege for editing foreign feeds or an expansion of the activity share role 'Co-Owner' to allow them to edit underlying feeds.   Thank you More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Currently in reports you can filter like User-Field XY = (current user) We would like to have the option to create reports for teams of users, who are already organized in Usergroups. One of them is ...set in the item as responsible user, but the other team members should be enabled to see all his/her items without defining complicated filters. Especially because the responsible person might change, but the team remains the same. So a filter of: current user is member of item.MultiUserfield or item.SingleUserField is member of SelectedUserGroup would be great. Or even both. Thank you. More
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
    • Post is under moderation
      Add copy for Feeds, like you copy for Backlogs and other items. Add copy for Feeds, like you copy for Backlogs and other items.
      Stream item published successfully. Item will now be visible on your stream.
  • No blogs available.

  • DateTitle
    14/11/2016 Ability to apply multiple filter in work center activities
    10/11/2016 Ability to apply more than one filter in work center activities
    21/09/2016 Duplicate or "save as" option for all feeds, activities and kanban boards
    05/01/2016 add rating widget to sbm to allow users to rate items
    05/01/2016 add tag widget to sbm to allow users to tag items

Recent Tweets